Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 463 SO2D 7 - State ex rel. Sprinkle v. Cain

State ex rel. Sprinkle v. Cain’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1989
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 419 So. 2d 858 - State v. Raymo · 449 So. 2d 1321 - State v. Watson · 339 So. 2d 1194 - State v. Searle · State v. Dill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The function of the court-appointed counsel is not to create rights for an accused; but, rather, to advocate the facts favorable to a defendant's opposition and to assert and/or protect those rights granted to the accused by our constitutions and statutory laws. As designated by its name `brief', the document filed by counsel is intended to be a precise and to the point recitation of his client's position under the applicable facts and circumstances of the case. Its purpose is not to raise irrelevant issues and law."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.