Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

463 S.W.3d 467

Cordell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 2015

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2015-06-09

Decided 2015-06-09

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Larry Cordell appeals from the motion court’s Judgment denying, without an evi-dentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035.1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use *468only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

¶3. Mo. R. Crim. P. 2013.

/463/sw3d/467 · .json · Public domain