Ex parte Gonzales’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 358th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on 132 S. Ct. 1309 - Martinez v. Ryan · Rees v. Peyton · Ramon Mata Jr v. Gary Johnson · Medina, Hector Rolando · Gonzales v. Quarterman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“you are entitled for [sic] an attorney to file a Writ of Habeas Corpus in addition to the attorney for the appeal. Now, do you wish that to be done? Do you want an attorney?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gonzales v. Davis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.