Illinois v. Batchelder’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
88 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 105 later decisions (13 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2018 · most notably Superintendent Massachusetts Correctional Institution Walpole v. Hill (1985), New Jersey v. T. L. O. (1985)
88 state decisions — followed in 15 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Mathews v. Eldridge · Delaware v. Prouse · Perez. v. Campbell · South Dakota v. Neville
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 105 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The interest of the states in depriving the drunk driver of permission to continue operating an automobile is particularly strong. We recently commented on ‘[t]he carnage caused by drunk drivers’ in South Dakota v. Neville, 459 U.S. 553, 558 , 103 S.Ct. 916, 920 , 74 L.Ed.2d 748 (1983). See also Mackey v. Montrym, supra, 443 U.S. [1] at 17-18, 99 S.Ct. [2612] at 2620-2621 [ 61 L.Ed.2d 321 (1979) ]; Perez v. Campbell, 402 U.S. 637 , 657 and 672, 91 S.Ct. 1704 , 1715 and 1722, 29 L.Ed.2d 233 (1971) (BLACKMUN, J., concurring); Tate v. Short, 401 U.S. 395, 401 , 91 S.Ct. 668, 672 , 28 L.Ed.2d 130 (1971) (BLACKMUN, J., concurring); Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432, 439 , 77 S.Ct. 408, 412 , 1 L.Ed.2d 448 (1957).””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Price v. Reed“'had reasonable cause to believe the person was driving the motor vehicle . . . while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. . . .'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'what process is due to protect against an erroneous deprivation of that interest.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.