Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 463 U.S. 476 - United States v. Baggot

United States v. Baggot’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

438
cited by 438 later decisions
5
cited 5 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
March 2020
most recently cited

187 federal appellate · 50 district · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 438 later decisions (5 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2020 · most notably United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc. (1983), Dahlstrom v. Commissioner (1985)

187 federal appellate · 50 district · 19 state decisions

259019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6212 · 26 U.S.C. § 6331 · 7 U.S.C. § 6C

Relies on United States v. Procter & Gamble Co. · Mansion House Center South Redevelopment Co. v. United States · Douglas Oil Company of California v. Petrol Stops Northwest · United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 438 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when so directed by a court preliminarily to or in connection with a judicial proceeding.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “preliminar[y] to or in connection with a judicial proceeding”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “reflects a judgment that not every beneficial purpose, or even every valid governmental purpose, is an appropriate reason for breaching grand jury secrecy.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.