In re Luckham’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1306 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 348 · 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 11 U.S.C. § 541
Relies on Schwab v. Reilly · Rousey v. Jacoway · Marcelino Barbosa · Robert Nelson v. Joseph Scala Sr · Gebhart v. Gaughan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“certain property ... in full regardless of value.... Limited-interest exemptions, in contrast, allow a debtor to exempt an "interest”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Cruz“exemptions. In-kind exemptions are those that allow a debtor to exempt”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Cruz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.