Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 464 F.2d 347 - Bassett v. Smith

Bassett v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

464 F.2d 347 · 1972

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
states following
May 1990
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently May 1990 · most notably Boykins v. Wainwright (1984), Carpenter v. United States (1981)

19 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

240197219801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · United States v. Wade · Stovall v. Denno · Johnson v. State of New Jersey · Duncan v. State of Louisiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “permitting the states wide latitude in fashioning rules of evidence.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “create the possibility that the jury might misapprehend the proper burden.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.