Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

464 F.2d 448

Docket No. 72-1199.

Edward Sanchez v. Allen F. Breed

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

July 17, 1972.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1972-07-17

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1976

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“"Sanchez has a civil rights case pending in a district court. That court has dismissed as to one defendant. "Sanchez attempts an appeal on the dismissal as to one party. He asks this court to overturn the district court's denial of leave to appeal in forma pauperis. "The appeal is dismissed. No order has been entered under Rule 54(b) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The lack of such an order is jurisdictional."”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Geyer v. City of Logansport

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1972-07-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Ninth Circuit.

Edward Sanchez, in pro. per.

Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., John D. Maharg, L. A. County Counsel, John P. Farrell, Deputy County Counsel, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.

Before CHAMBERS, MERRILL and TRASK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Sanchez has a civil rights case pending in a district court. That court has dismissed as to one defendant.

¶2

Sanchez attempts an appeal on the dismissal as to one party. He asks this court to overturn the district court's denial of leave to appeal in forma pauperis.

¶3

The appeal is dismissed. No order has been entered under Rule 54(b) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The lack of such an order is jurisdictional.

/464/f2d/448 · .json · Public domain