Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 464 F.2d 552 - United States v. Sutton

United States v. Sutton’s Empirical Analysis

464 F.2d 552 · 1972

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
3
states following
October 2014
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently October 2014

13 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

13019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (Criminal Justice Act)

Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Marshall v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he manifest purpose of requiring that the inquiry be ex parte is to insure that the defendant will not have to make a premature disclosure of his case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he ex parte requirement could hardly be expressed in clearer language.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.