Richard Maddox v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare’s Empirical Analysis
464 F.2d 617 · 1972
Citation profile
30 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1992 · most notably Califano v. Sanders (1977), Rothman v. Hospital Service (1975)
30 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 5 U.S.C. § 704
Relies on Cappadora v. Celebrezze · Hobby v. Hodges · Filice v. Celebrezze · Davis v. Richardson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ . . . No findings of fact or decision of the Secretary shall be reviewed by any person, tribunal, or governmental agency except as herein provided. . . . ””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“". . . We observe that 42 U.S. C. § 405(g) makes provision for judicial review of the merits of a claim following a final decision of the Secretary. The Administrative Procedure Act, on the other hand, makes provision for review under the limited criteria set forth in that Act. The provision applicable here limits review to final agency action for which there is no other adequate remedy in a court. . . .” 464 F.2d at 621”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Any individual, after any final decision of the Secretary made after a hearing to which he was a party, irrespective of the amount in controversy, may obtain a review of such decision by a civil action commenced within sixty days after the mailing to him of notice of such decision or within such further time as the Secretary may allow.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.