Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 464 F.2d 714 - Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,549 Irwin Popkin v. Warner B. Bishop

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,549 Irwin Popkin v. Warner B. Bishop’s Empirical Analysis

464 F.2d 714 · 1972

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
1
states following
July 1992
most recently cited

34 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently July 1992 · most notably Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,853 John Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corporation (1974), IIT v. Vencap, Ltd. (1975)

34 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

600197219801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78B (§ 2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

Relies on Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co. · Superintendent of Insurance of State of New York v. Bankers Life and Casualty Company · Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Securities, Inc. · Coates v. Securities & Exchange Commission · Securities & Exchange Commission v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “merger transactions . . ., under state law, must be subjected to shareholder approval . . . if federal law ensures that shareholder approval is fairly sought and freely given, the principal federal interest is at an end,”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “assertions by a defendant that the misconduct complained of 'really' amounts to 'just' corporate mismanagement will not cut off a plaintiff's federal remedy.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “In many, if not most, corporate self-dealing transactions touching securities, state law does not demand prior shareholder approval. In those situations, it makes sense'to concentrate on the impropriety of the conduct itself rather than on the “failure to disclose” it because full and fair disclosure in a real sense will rarely occur.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.