Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 464 F.2d 735 - Hiram Cazes Parnell v. Louie L. Wainwright

Hiram Cazes Parnell v. Louie L. Wainwright’s Empirical Analysis

464 F.2d 735 · 1972

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
October 1994
most recently cited

19 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1994 · most notably Wingo v. Wedding (1974), United States v. Cruz (1978)

19 federal appellate ·

190197219801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Sedillo v. United States · Harris v. United States · Von Moltke v. Gillies

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The magistrate's findings of fact receive the imprimatur of Rule 52(a) by the district court's adoption of those findings as its own.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.