United States v. Fried’s Empirical Analysis
464 F.2d 983 · 1972
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2315 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 659
Relies on Nye & Nissen v. United States · Wilson v. United States · Union Carbide Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · North Carolina Natural Gas Corp. v. McJunkin Corp. · United States v. Bozza
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Brach’s knowledge that the Levy stereos had been stolen was also proven inferentially only, but it was proven — not merely because the goods his trucking concern delivered were stolen or by his relationship to his mother as a Fried Co. owner, but also by the unusual circumstances of his delivery of $5,000 worth of stereos without a bill or an invoice and by the use of a part-time police officer for delivery purposes, thereby removing Brach himself from the transportation of the stolen goods, although he was on hand at Levy's at the time of delivery.” Id. at 985 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.