Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 464 F.3d 263 - Harris

Harris’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
June 2022
most recently cited

1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably 289 F. App'x 461 - Muller-Paisner v. Tiaa, Tiaa-Cref Enterprises, Inc. (2008), In Re Old Carco LLC (2009)

1 district ·

150200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on BFP v. Resolution Trust Corporation · Thomas v. Roach · West v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. · Registercom Inc v. Verio Inc · Hartford Courant Co. v. Pellegrino

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “on the basis of an erroneous view of the applicable law,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3) of this subdivision, when an act is required or allowed to be done at or within a specified period by these rules or by a notice given thereunder or by order of court, the court for cause shown may at any time in its discretion (1) with or without motion or notice order the period enlarged if the request therefor is made before the expiration of the period originally prescribed or as extended by a previous order or (2) on motion made after the expiration of the specified period permit the act to be done where the failure to act was the result of excusable neglect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[ujnlike the situation in Lynch, Harris did file a timely record and designation. Because it was the contents of the filings that were at issue rather than the timeliness of the filings, Rule 9006, which concerns when a court should excuse a missed deadline, is not applicable.”) (italics in original). 7 . See In re Ben-Baruch, No. 05-CV-5684, slip op at 4 (E.D.N.Y. July 26, 2006) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.