United States v. Rangolan’s Empirical Analysis
464 F.3d 321 · 2006
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3691 · 18 U.S.C. § 401
Relies on Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co. · Bloom v. Illinois · International Union, United Mine Workers v. Bagwell · Taylor v. Hayes · Nye v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a necessary and integral part of the independence of the judiciary, and is absolutely essential to the performance of the duties imposed on them by law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“in its presence if the judge saw or heard the contemptuous conduct and so certifies.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Gates
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.