In Re Ren Vzquez-Botet’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 2024
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Giglio v. United States · Liteky et al United States · In re United States · McCuin v. Texas Power & Light Co. · In re Kansas Public Employees Retirement System
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“while an attorney need not be 'enrolled as counsel' of record in order to fall within [§ 455(b)(5)(ii)], the attorney must at least 'actually participate in the case.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re: US v.“[w]e are . . . disinclined to address . . . matters in the abstract, on the basis of speculative scenarios about what may or may not transpire at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“`[E]ven where the merits clearly favor the petitioner, relief may be withheld for lack of irreparable injury[.]'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.