Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 464 F.3d 813 - Rahn v. Hawkins

Rahn v. Hawkins’s Empirical Analysis

464 F.3d 813 · 2006

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
2
states following
January 2025
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably State v. White (2015), Sherman v. Winco Fireworks, Inc. (2008)

18 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

260200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1870 · 28 U.S.C. § 2111 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on United States v. Olano · Graham v. Connor · Arizona v. Fulminante · Johnson v. United States · Neder v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] statement is attributable to a person when he or she stands silent in the face of its utterance if the natural response would be to deny it if untrue”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) there is an error; (2) the error is clear and obvious, rather than subject to reasonable dispute; (3) the error affected the appellant's substantial rights, which in the ordinary case means it affected the outcome of the district court proceedings; and (4) the error seriously affects the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he error disadvantaged both sides equally, and there is no evidence that the jury finally seated was anything less than completely fair”); United States v. Pryor, 195 Fed.Appx. 65, 71 (3d Cir.2006) (finding that the trial court’s”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.