464 F. Supp. 152 - Becker v. Blum’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 2013
1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 42 U.S.C. § 1396A (§ 1902 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Goldberg v. Kelly · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Heyman v. Commerce & Industry Insurance · Beal v. Doe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““written notice that includes a statement of what action the agency intends to take, the reasons for the intended agency action, the specific regulations supporting such action, explanation of the individual’s right to request an evidentiary hearing (if provided) and a State agency hearing, and the circumstances under which assistance is continued if a hearing is requested;””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“means that the notice is mailed at least 10 days before the date of action, that is, the date upon which the action would become effective; (iii) When changes in either State or Federal law require automatic grant adjustments for classes of recipients, timely notice of such grant adjustments shall be given which shall be”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rosas v. McMahon““The agency may deny or dismiss a request for a hearing . . where the sole issue is one of State or Federal law requiring automatic grant adjustments for classes of recipients . . . ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.