Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 464 MASS 365 - Commonwealth v. Figueroa

Commonwealth v. Figueroa’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
November 2021
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1512 · 18 U.S.C. § 1515

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Mempa v. Rhay · Commonwealth v. Latimore · McNamara v. County of San Diego Department of Social Services

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[A] statute must be interpreted according to the intent of the Legislature ascertained from all its words construed by the ordinary and approved usage of the language, considered in connection with the cause of its enactment, the mischief or imperfection to be remedied and the main object to be accomplished, to the end that the purpose of its framers may be effectuated.' Commonwealth v. Figueroa, 464 Mass. 365, 368 (2013), quoting from Harvard Crimson, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College, 445 Mass. 745, 749 (2006). Where a literal reading would 'lead to an awkward and even intolerable 14 result,' we will eschew it 'for a more liberal or more encompassing approach.' Mailhot v. Travelers Ins. Co., 375 Mass. 342, 348 (1978).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “‘“(A) knowingly making a false statement; (B) intentionally omitting information from a statement and thereby causing a portion of such statement to be misleading, or intentionally concealing a material fact, and thereby creating a false impression by such statement; (C) with intent to mislead, knowingly submitting or inviting reliance on a writing or recording that is false, forged, altered, or otherwise lacking in authenticity; (D) with intent to mislead, knowingly submitting or inviting reliance on a sample, specimen, map, photograph, boundary mark, or other object that is misleading in a material respect; or (E) knowingly using a trick, scheme, or device with intent to mislead.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““Whoever, directly or indirectly, willfully misleads ... [a] police officer . . . with the intent to impede, obstruct, delay, harm, punish or otherwise interfere thereby . . . with ... a [criminal] proceeding shall be punished.’’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.