State v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
2019
Citation profile
11 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 812 (§ 202 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Albrecht · Faya v. Almaraz · 134 S. Ct. 881 - Burrage v. United States · 134 S. Ct. 1710 - Paroline v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Ingesting heroin is a foreseeable result of its supply, and death a foreseeable consequence of 19 its ingestion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.