Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 2009
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 49 U.S.C. § 14504 · 49 U.S.C. § 14505 · 49 U.S.C. § 301
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(B) RECEIPTS; FEE SYSTEM.—Such amended standards— . . . . "(iv) shall establish a fee system for the filing of proof of insurance as provided under subparagraph (A)(ii) of this paragraph that (I) will be based on the number of commercial motor vehicles the carrier operates in a State and on the number of States in which the carrier operates, (II) will minimize the costs of complying with the registration system, and (III) will result in a fee for each participating State that is equal to the fee, not to exceed $10 per vehicle, that such State collected or charged as of November 15, 1991 . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[w]e must look not at the fees paid by [petitioner] in any given year, but at the generic fee Michigan charged or collected from carriers as of November 15, 1991.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he new `fee system' is based not on the fees collected from one individual company, but on the fee system that the state had in place on November 15, 1991,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.