Graham v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently August 2001
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wong Sun v. United States · Brown v. Illinois · Rideout v. United States · Frisbie v. Collins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Our inquiry further necessitates a determination of whether or not Appellant's confession was the product of his detention. This Court has written: 'The [United States Supreme] Court noted that persons arrested illegally (or, in our case, detained illegally) may decide to confess, as an act of free will unaffected by the initial illegality. And, the determination, whether the confession is the product of free will under Wong Sun [v. United States] [(1963) 371 U.S. 471 , 83 S.Ct. 407 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441 ], is dependent entirely on the facts of the particular cause. However, the Court went on to suggest four relevant factors: (1) whether the individual was informed of his rights as required by Miranda, (2) the temporal proximity of the arrest and the confession, (3) the presence of intervening circumstances, and (4) 'particularly, the purpose and flagrancy of the official misconduct.! ...' Williams v. State, (1976) 264 Ind. 664, 670 , 348 N.E.2d 623, 628 , on remand, (1978) 268 Ind. 365 , 375 N.E.2d 226 ; See Brown v. Illinois, (1975) 422 U.S. 590 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 LEd.2d 416."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jackson v. State“actually resided with his grandmother and father.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stewart v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.