Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

464 N.E.2d 1302

Davenport v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1984

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1984-07-06

Relies on Smith v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1984-07-06

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably Lampkins v. State (1997), Lampkins v. State (1997)

41 state decisions

1401984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PRENTICE, Justice,

¶1concurring in result.

¶2I concur in the affirmance of the judgment.

¶3With regard to the sufficiency of the evidence upon the conviction for attempted murder, I am of the opinion that the majority's statement that premeditation is no longer an element of the crime of murder is misplaced but unnecessary to the result. Although murder does not now necessarily encompass intent or premeditation, the crime of "Attempt" does. Smith a/k/a Watford v. State, (1984) Ind., 459 N.E.2d 355.

¶4Notwithstanding the Jury's gratuitous recommendation for leniency, a finding of the necessary element of intent was not negated. The words were mere surplusage and should be treated accordingly. Additionally, the use of the term "unpremeditated nature of the act" in the statement of the Jury obviously meant that the act of shooting was done in haste-without cool reflection-and not as a word of art to denote the element of a crime. To say that one attempted an act but did not intend to do so or did not premeditate it is a contradiction of terms.

/464/ne2d/1302 · .json · Public domain