State v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Voss · United States v. Ford · State v. Brown · State v. Belieu · State v. Sauls
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When an indictment or information jointly charges two or more defendants, those defendants may be tried jointly if in the discretion of the court a joint trial will not result in prejudice to one or more of the parties. Otherwise, defendants shall be tried separately. When jointly tried, defendants shall be adjudged separately on each count.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Olsen“[w]e will reverse a trial court's refusal to grant a motion for separate trials only if a defendant demonstrates an abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.