Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

464 P.2d 942

Toosigah, State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 15, 1969

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · decided 1969-10-15

Relies on Wolfchief v. State · Moore v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1969-10-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently November 2015

17 state decisions

100196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1MEMORANDUM OPINION

NIX, Judge.

¶2Plaintiff in error, Phillip Don Toosigah, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was charged in the County Court of Caddo County, Oklahoma, with the crime of being “drunk in a public place.” He was tried by a jury, found guilty, and his punishment assessed at 10 days in the county jail, and to pay a fine of $50.00. From that judgment and sentence he has appealed to this Court alleging one main assignment of error: “That the trial court erred in failing to sustain defendant’s motion to quash the jury panel.” More particularly, he complains that there were no Indians on the jury panel, and since the defendant was a full-blooded Indian, it was error.

¶3This Court has fully dealt with this question in two very recent cases: Moore v. State, handed down October 1, 1969, cited as Okl.Cr., 461 P.2d 1017; and, Wolfchief v. State, handed down October 8, 1969, cited as Okl.Cr., 461 P.2d 949.

¶4Therefore, it is the opinion of this Court that the judgment and sentence in this cause be, and the same is, affirmed.

BRETT, P. J., and BUSSEY, J., concur.
/464/p2d/942 · .json · Public domain