464 So. 2d 1040 - State v. Munzy’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 1999
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Sepulvado · Kring v. State of Missouri · 411 So. 2d 415 - State v. Vaccaro · State v. Lewis · 342 So. 2d 630 - State v. Sepulvado
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The state or the defendant may challenge a juror for cause on the ground that: *• * * # # * (2) The juror is not impartial, whatever the cause of his partiality. An opinion or impression as to the guilt or innocence of the defendant shall not of itself be sufficient ground of challenge to a juror, if he declares, and the court is satisfied, that he can render an impartial verdict according to the law and the evidence....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Collier
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.