Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 464 So. 2d 1192 - State v. Lanier

464 So. 2d 1192 - State v. Lanier’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2017

20 state decisions

901985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 382 So. 2d 1216 - Williams v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. · 443 So. 2d 178 - Lanier v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the crime of lewd and lascivious handling, fondling, or assault of a child included sexual intercourse and other acts defined as sexual battery.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “both prior to and subsequent to the 1984 Amendment is violated when a male engages in sexual intercourse with a twelve-year-old girl... .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “800.04 Lewd, lascivious, or indecent assault or act upon or in presence of a child; sexual battery.—Any person who: (1) Handles, fondles, or makes an assault upon any child under the age of 16 years in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner; (2) Commits an act defined as sexual battery under s. 794.011(1)(h) upon any child under the age of 16 years; or (3) Knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of any child under the age of 16 years without committing the crime of sexual battery is guilty of a felony of the second degree.... Neither the victim's lack of chastity nor the victim's lack of consent is a defense to the crime proscribed by this section.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.