Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

464 So. 2d 1364

Carter v. Deitz

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 15, 1985

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1985-03-15

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 1999

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-03-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1In re: Hanemann, James Jr.; Applying for Supervisory Writs and/or Writ of Mandamus and Stay Order; Parish of Orleans Civil District Court Div. “L” Number 78-11981; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Number C-3485.

¶2DENIED.

MARCUS, J.,

¶3would grant, being of the opinion that the relator attorney should be required to deliver to his clients “all papers and property to which the client is entitled,” after a hearing before the trial judge. This may or may not include his entire file. See Disciplinary Rule 2— 110(A)(2) of the Code of Professional Responsibility.

/464/so2d/1364 · .json · Public domain