464 So. 2d 211 - Tucker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
April 1991
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 448 So. 2d 1013 - State v. Rhoden · Carter v. State · Smith v. State · 452 So. 2d 955 - Addison v. State · 450 So. 2d 926 - Harvey v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an incorrectly calculated minimum-maximum sentence range under the guidelines constitutes an erroneous base upon which the trial court exercises its discretion in aggravating the sentence, and requires reversal for resentencing, even in the absence of a contemporaneous objection.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sellers v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.