464 So. 2d 578 - Holley v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 1991
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 436 So. 2d 93 - Combs v. State · 412 So. 2d 461 - Swartz v. Swartz · 438 So. 2d 1 - Palmer v. State · Ivester v. State · 452 So. 2d 548 - Whitfield v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Is Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Criminal) 3.04(d) a correct statement of the law in light of Ivester v. State, 398 So.2d 926 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), review denied, 412 So.2d 470 (Fla. 1982), and Allen v. State, 424 So.2d 101 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), review denied, 436 So.2d 97 (Fla. 1983)?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.