Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 464 So. 2d 689 - Farrow v. State

464 So. 2d 689 - Farrow v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 1991
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 111 So. 2d 665 - Adams v. Culver · Tirko v. Wainwright · Pedroso v. State · 240 So. 2d 150 - White v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We construe the quoted provision [Section 944.40] to mean that any sentence for escape must run consecutively to any other sentence or sentences to which the offender is subject at the time of the escape. The obvious intent of the Legislature was to prescribe a penalty which would be added to all penalties previously imposed as a deterrent to a prisoner inclined to break jail, [emphasis added]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The punishment of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be in addition to any former sentence imposed upon any prisoner convicted hereunder.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.