Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 464 So. 2d 69 - Universal Computer Services, Inc. v. Lyall

464 So. 2d 69 - Universal Computer Services, Inc. v. Lyall’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2019

8 state decisions

501985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fuentes v. Shevin · Shaffer v. Heitner · Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay View · Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co. · 462 So. 2d 696 - Administrators of the Tulane Ed. Fund v. Cooley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the procedural rule by which a party seeks to enforce or resist enforcement of, the remedy of garnishment is that provided in our garnishment statutes, supplemented only by so much of the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure as may be found not inconsistent with those statutes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “set forth a claim for relief ... [which] shall contain (1) a short and plain statement ... showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and (2) a demand for judgment for the relief to which he deems himself entitled.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “In reviewing the pleading, Lyall's complaint prayed that the court attach "the effects of or indebtedness to said nonresident... in the hands of the plaintiff, one 1981 Chevrolet Chevette automobile”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.