Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

464 So. 2d 697

464 So.2d 697

10 Fla.L.Weekly 602

Ashcraft v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1985-03-08

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 2010

2 state decisions

Relies on Zigler v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-03-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

OTT, Acting Chief Judge.

¶1After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error and we therefore affirm. However, because of a clerical error in the court’s written judgment, we remand for correction.

¶2The parties agree that a jury found appellant guilty of unarmed burglary, a second-degree felony. However, the written judgment erroneously adjudicates appellant guilty of armed burglary, a first-degree felony. No sentence was imposed for this crime.

¶3Consequently, we remand this cause to the trial court for correction of the clerical error. See Zigler v. State, 446 So.2d 266 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). In all other respects, this cause is affirmed.

¶4AFFIRMED AND REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF JUDGMENT.

SCHOONOVER and LEHAN, JJ., concur.
/464/so2d/697 · .json · Public domain