¶1We reverse. In our view the evidence against the appellant was insufficient to establish anything more than a suspicion of misconduct. See Danek v. State, 429 So.2d 1369 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) and Miller v. State, 420 So.2d 631 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).
464 So. 2d 712
Adams v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 13, 1985
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1985-03-13
Relies on 420 So. 2d 631 - Miller v. State · Kimble v. State
Decided 1985-03-13