Estave v. McCarty Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 451 So. 2d 1193 - Kerwin v. Nu-Way Const. Service, Inc. · Gilbert v. Gilbert · 442 So. 2d 536 - Thornell v. Payne & Keller, Inc. · 415 So. 2d 174 - Carter v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc. · 436 So. 2d 737 - Myles v. T.L. James & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We do not interpret the rule of Carter, supra, which imposes liability on the last causative’ employer in occupational disease cases to mean that the last chronological employer will be held liable in all cases.” Id. at 875.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.