Autry v.’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 16 U.S.C. § 1456 · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Sanders v. United States · Harris v. Pulley · California v. Watt · Autry v. Wj Estelle a-197 · Autry v. Wj Estelle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]n view of our decision to give the case plenary consideration, I cannot say that the issue lacks substance”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.