Decker Leumi Financial Corporation’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently September 2016
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Thompson v. Magnolia Petroleum Co. · Earley v. DiCenso · Cline v. Kaplan · Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. R Laird · Scott Factors, Inc. v. Hartley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where not inconsistent with the provisions of this chapter, the court in which the petition is filed, shall, for the purposes of this chapter, have exclusive jurisdiction of the debtor and his property, wherever located.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“exclusive jurisdiction of the debtor and his property.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.