Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

465 F.2d 298

Docket No. 72-1581 Summary Calendar.*

Boles v. Dunlap

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

July 26, 1972. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Sept. 12, 1972.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1972-07-26

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1972

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Household Finance Corp. of Atlanta v. Jones

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1972-07-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Fifth Circuit.

Sanford D. Weiss, Montgomery, Ala., for appellant.

Miles S. Hall, Montgomery, Ala., for appellee.

Before BELL, DYER and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

This appeal from an order granting injunctive relief in a bankruptcy matter involving $219.09 is dismissed. No petition has been filed to allow the appeal. Rule 6, FRAP. Treating the notice of appeal, however, as a request for leave to appeal under 11 U.S.C.A. Sec. 47(a), we do not find the question presented to be of sufficient importance to warrant an appeal. Cf. Household Finance Corporation of Atlanta v. Jones, 5 Cir., 1963, 322 F.2d 228.

¶2

Appeal dismissed.

¶3

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM:

¶4

The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.

/465/f2d/298 · .json · Public domain