Hodgson v. Royal Crown Bottling Co.’s Empirical Analysis
465 F.2d 473 · 1972
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently July 1999
13 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 251 (Employee Commuting Flexibility Act of 1996)
Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Fred Wolferman, Inc. v. Gustafson · 324 F. Supp. 342 - Hodgson v. Royal Crown Bottling Company · Credit Service, Inc. v. Fleming
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if he pleads and proves that the act or omission complained of was in good faith in conformity with and in reliance on any written administrative regulation, order, ruling, approval, or interpretation, of the [Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor], or any administrative practice or enforcement policy of such agency with respect to the class of employers to which he belonged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the activities of an entirely different group of people,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.