Tierney Morahan Crawford Reilly Laffey’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
5 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 1993
5 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Kastigar v. United States · Harris v. New York · United States v. Procter & Gamble Co. · Gelbard v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whenever a witness refuses, on the basis of his privilege against self-incrimination, to testify or provide other information in a proceeding before it or ancillary to— (1) a court or grand jury of the United States . and the person presiding over the proceeding communicates to the witness an order issued under this part, the witness may not refuse to comply with the order on the basis of his privilege against self incrimination; but no testimony or other information compelled under the order (or any information directly or indirectly derived from such testimony or other information) may be used against the witness in any criminal case, except a, prosecution for perjury, giving a false statement, or otherwise failing to comply with the order, (emphasis added)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. United States v. Doe“as soon as practicable, but not later than thirty days from the filing of such appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.