Stanley v. Bartley’s Empirical Analysis
465 F.3d 810 · 2006
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently December 2022 · most notably Mosley v. Atchison (2012), Harris v. Thompson (2012)
17 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Kyles v. Whitley · Woodford v. Visciotti · Brown v. Payton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“although this additional testimony would have affected the weight accorded the identification testimony of Stewart and Tate, the effect of the alleged deficiencies was not so significant as to cast doubt on the outcome of the trial. Therefore, we conclude that the defendant cannot establish that the outcome of the trial would have been different absent the alleged deficiencies of trial counsel....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Malone v. Walls“Having expounded the well-known standard correctly on the previous page of its opinion, it is more likely that the court stated its conclusion imprecisely than that it applied a different standard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Woods v. Schwartz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.