Commonwealth v. Hanright’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co. · Democratic Party of the United States v. Wisconsin ex rel. La Follette · H. K. Porter Co. v. National Labor Relations Board · Blasius v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“after the defendant expresses the clear intent to raise as an issue his or her mental condition, [and] the judge is satisfied that (1) the defendant intends to testify, or (2) the defendant intends to offer expert testimony based in whole or in part on statements made by the defendant as to his or her mental condition at the relevant time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a]t the time [the examiner's report] is disclosed to the parties, the defendant shall provide the Commonwealth with a report of the defense psychiatric or psychological expert(s) as to the mental condition of the defendant at the relevant time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“intends at trial to raise as an issue his or her * mental condition at the time of the alleged crime, or ... intends to introduce expert testimony on [his or her] mental condition at any stage of the proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.