Beaudrie v. Henderson’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
40
cited by 40 later decisions
7
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
33 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 371 So. 2d 1010 - Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River Cty. · 74 Wis. 2d 526 - Coffey v. City of Milwaukee · Ryan v. State · Maiden v. Rozwood · Adams v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if no factual development could possibly justify recovery.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(a) The officer [or] employee ... is acting or reasonably believes he or she is acting within the scope of his or her authority. (b) The governmental agency is engaged in the exercise or discharge of a governmental function. (c) The officer's [or] employee's ... conduct does not amount to gross negligence that is the proximate cause of the injury or damage. [ MCL 691.1407(2).]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[A] traditional common-law duty analysis provides a far more familiar and workable framework for determining whether a public employee owes a tort-enforceable duty in a given case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.