Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 465 Mich. 319 - People v. Custer

People v. Custer’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2011
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]pplication of constitutional standards by the trial court is not entitled to the same deference as factual findings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.