465 So. 2d 1196 - Agee v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently August 2004 · most notably 516 So. 2d 768 - Ex Parte Jackson (1987), 516 So. 2d 726 - Jackson v. State (1985)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Townsend v. Sain · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Bumper v. North Carolina · Milton v. Wainwright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Where the State offers evidence tending to show that the crime was committed within the jurisdiction of the court, the question of venue then becomes one for the jury to decide. Willcutt v. State , 284 Ala. 547 , 226 So.2d 328 (1969); Grace v. State , 369 So.2d 318 (Ala.Crim.App. 1979); Gipson v. State , 375 So.2d 504 (Ala.Crim.App. 1978). The jury has the option of believing or not believing a witness who testifies as to venue."”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage““While it is true that any promise or inducement, however slight, either direct or implied, will render a confession involuntary. Eakes v. State, 387 So.2d 855 (Ala.Crim.App.1978), the test that must be applied in determining the voluntariness of a confessor’s statements is whether the confessor’s will was overborne at the time he confessed. Green v. State, 439 So.2d 816 (Ala.Crim.App.1983); Minor v. State, 437 So.2d 651 (Ala.Crim.App.1983); Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293 , 83 S.Ct. 745 , 9 L.Ed.2d 770 (1963); Elliott v. State, 338 So.2d 483 (Ala.Crim.App.1976). An examination of all ‘attendant circumstances’ is the proper method for conducting a test of the voluntary nature of a confession.” Agee v. State, 465 So.2d 1196, 1198 (Ala.Cr.App.1984).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““When an offense is committed partly in one county and partly in another or the acts or effects thereof constituting or requisite to the consummation of the offense occur in two or more counties, venue is in either county.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.