Logan v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 2013
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 355 So. 2d 1381 - Odom v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) whether the question was relevant to the voir dire examination (2) whether it was unambiguous (3) whether the juror had substantial knowledge of the information sought to be elicited.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Brown v. State · Ables v. State“... No firm, unbending rule can be laid down that would control every situation that might arise on the voir dire of perspective jurors. Therefore, each case must be decided on an ad hoc basis considering the facts then before the court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Brown v. State · Sewell v. State“Have any of you or any of your close relatives been the victim of such a crime or a similar crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.