Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

465 So. 2d 528

465 So.2d 528

10 Fla.L.Weekly 167

Florida Bar v. Ludwig

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 7, 1985

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1985-03-07

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1988

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-03-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1These consolidated attorney-discipline proceedings are before us on the complaint of The Florida Bar and the uncontested report of the referee.* Respondent was convicted of one count of grand theft and five felony counts of delivery of a controlled substance. The referee found that *529respondent committed the crimes charged and thereby violated article XI, Rules 11.-02(8)(b) and 11.02(4) of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, and Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(1), 1-102(A)(6), and 9-102(B)(3) of The Florida Bar Code of Professional Responsibility. The referee recommended that respondent be disbarred from the practice of law in Florida.

¶2We approve the findings of fact and recommendations of the referee. Accordingly, respondent is disbarred from the practice of law, effective immediately. The costs of these proceedings in the amount of $1,018.61 are assessed against respondent, for which let execution issue.

¶3It is so ordered.

OVERTON, Acting C.J., and ALDERMAN, MCDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

¶4 We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.

/465/so2d/528 · .json · Public domain