Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 465 So. 2d 607 - Suarez Ortega v. Pujals De Suarez

465 So. 2d 607 - Suarez Ortega v. Pujals De Suarez’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 2011

8 state decisions

601985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 430 So. 2d 448 - Smith v. State · 446 So. 2d 97 - Mora v. City of Fort Lauderdale · 433 So. 2d 1015 - Nelson v. Nelson · 378 So. 2d 812 - Trujillo v. Trujillo · 253 So. 2d 435 - Crane v. Hayes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[t]he general policies of this act extend to the international area. The provisions of this act relating to the recognition and enforcement of custody decrees of other states apply to custody decrees, and decrees involving legal institutions similar in nature to custody institutions, rendered by appropriate authorities of other nations if reasonable notice and opportunity to be heard were given to all affected persons."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “Although the Mexican provisional custody decree was obtained by the husband after an ex parte hearing, this procedure is the same as that followed in Florida. There has been no showing that the Mexican court will not accord minimum due process when ruling on the issue of permanent child custody. * * * * * * Neither has it been shown that Mexico would not exercise jurisdiction in principles embodied in the UCCJA (citation). The authority of the trial court in this case rested solely on the fact that the wife, obviously seeking a friendlier forum, brought the child to this state.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.