Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 465 SW2D 57 - Young v. Arms

Young v. Arms’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 1978
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Russell Construction Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Board · Altizer Coal Co. v. Clevinger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. Even if the Special Fund had been made a party in this case, the procedures outlined in KRS 342.121 would not have required the appointment of a physician by the board unless the evidence in the record disclosed a controversy about a medical question or established that the case was a proper one for apportionment and revealed the necessity for determining a medical question in order to make a proper apportionment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.