Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 466 A2D 1220 - In Re Malvin

In Re Malvin’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
5
states following
June 2013
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2013

8 state decisions

301983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gault · Andresen v. Maryland · United States v. White · Spevack v. Klein · Bellis v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether the attorney is causing irreparable public harm by misappropriating client funds to his own use, or by other means, (2) whether there is a substantial likelihood, based on all the available evidence, including affidavits, that a significant sanction will be imposed on the attorney at the conclusion of any pending disciplinary proceedings, (3) whether the balance of injuries, as between attorney and clients, favors a temporary suspension, and (4) whether the public interest would be served by a temporary suspension.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[tlhe temporary suspension of an attorney pending the completion of disciplinary proceedings has the same effect as a preliminary injunction barring that attorney from the practice of law”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “causing great public harm by misappropriating funds to his own use, or by other means.” It reasoned:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.